Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: deal with enomem in the rewind path V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, August 08, 2013 at 16:28 (+0200), David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:36:52AM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>> Weird patch formatting concerning extent_io.c, I assume there are no changes in
>> extent_buffer_under_io and btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page, you just moved
>> btrfs_clone_extent_buffer, right? Perhaps --patience or --minimal could do
>> better? Otherwise,
> 
> git diff --patience produces identical result for me (1.8.3.1).

Yeah, I expected that after Josef said that he actually moved the other two
functions, so the structure really changed in a way git cannot diff any better.

>> Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                                  ^^^
> xfs? :)

Whoops :-) Replace that by btrfs if you wish.

-Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux