On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:56:40PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > > I am NO programmer by any stretch. Let's say I want them to be once > > every 5 min (300 sec). Is the attached patch sane to acheive this? > > I think it's a reasonable patch to try, yeah. There were a few requests to tune the interval. This finally made me to finish the patch and will send it in a second. > > Are there any unforeseen and effects of doing this? Thank you for > > the consideration. > > I don't *think* that there should be. One way of looking at it is that > both 30 and 300 seconds are an *eternity* for cpu, memory, and storage. > Any trouble that you could get in to in 300 seconds some other machine > could trivially get in to in 30 with beefier hardware. That's a good point and lowers my worries a bit, though it would be interesting to see in what way a beefy machine blows with 300 seconds set. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
