Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] Btrfs: introduce a tree for items that map UUIDs to something

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/26/2013 21:55, Zach Brown wrote:
+	if (!uuid_root) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto out;
+	}

WARN_ON_ONCE specifically returns the condition so that you can write:

	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uuid_root)) {
		ret = -ENOENT;
		goto out;
	}

+	while (item_size) {
+		u64 data;
+
+		read_extent_buffer(eb, &data, offset, sizeof(data));
+		data = le64_to_cpu(data);
+		if (data == subid) {
+			ret = 0;
+			break;
+		}
+		offset += sizeof(data);
+		item_size -= sizeof(data);
+	}

fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:81 col 24 warning: cast to restricted __le64

There are a few more instances of this.  The good news is that fixing
the sparse warning makes the code better, too.

		__le64 data;

		read_extent_buffer(eb, &data, offset, sizeof(data));
		if (le64_to_cpu(data) == subid) {

Plese make sure the rest of the series doesn't add sparse warnings for
Josef to get email about a few seconds after he merges.

+int btrfs_insert_uuid_subvol_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+				  struct btrfs_root *uuid_root, u8 *uuid,
+				  u64 subvol_id)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_lookup(uuid_root, uuid,
+				     BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL, subvol_id);
+	if (ret == -ENOENT)
+		ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_add(trans, uuid_root, uuid,
+					  BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL, subvol_id);
+	return ret;
+}


+int btrfs_insert_uuid_received_subvol_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+					   struct btrfs_root *uuid_root,
+					   u8 *uuid, u64 subvol_id)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_lookup(uuid_root, uuid,
+				     BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL, subvol_id);
+	if (ret == -ENOENT)
+		ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_add(trans, uuid_root, uuid,
+					  BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL,
+					  subvol_id);
+	return ret;
+}

Just have callers pass in the key type so we get slightly less enormous
function names and less cut-and-paste code.

Thanks for your comments, but this salami review procedure is not very efficient. Everything that you comment on now and before is there since V1.

Please tell me when you are done with the full review. And please also stop the bikeshedding.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux