On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:55PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> --- a/disk-io.c
> +++ b/disk-io.c
> @@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ static int close_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> while (!list_empty(list)) {
> device = list_entry(list->next, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> list_del_init(&device->dev_list);
> - if (device->fd) {
> + if (device->fd > 0) {
> - device = kmalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_NOFS);
> + device = kzalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_NOFS);
> if (!device)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - device->total_ios = 0;
Can you please describe the incremental change between the two patches?
Why do you exclude fd == 0 ?
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
