Re: [PATCH 0/3] Btrfs: qgroup rescan fixes for next rc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chris,

I know, Linus is turning grumpy again. I'd still feel better if we sent this
patch set for the very next rc now. Any particular objections?

-Jan

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 17:47 (+0200), Jan Schmidt wrote:
> Here are three fixes for the new qgroup rescan feature. The first two
> are quite small, the third one is a little bigger. I thought about
> splitting that one up, but in the end I didn't find a good point to
> break that up. It achieves more than one goal, I agree, but its more or
> less a compact code change that need not be split artifically in my
> opinion.
> 
> Jan Schmidt (3):
>   Btrfs: fix memory patcher through fs_info->qgroup_ulist
>   Btrfs: avoid double free of fs_info->qgroup_ulist
>   Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan resume on mount
> 
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h   |    2 +
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |    2 +
>  fs/btrfs/qgroup.c  |  198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux