Re: Btrfsck errors (fs tree 565 refs 125 not found) - how serious

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:06:50PM -0600, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I am able to induce the btrfsck errors I experienced using a synthetic
> workload on a fresh filesystem with linux-3.10.0.rc2.
> However as filing the bug-report would take quite some time (uploading
> 512mb trace-files, writing a short read-me, ...) I wonder whether this
> is an issue woth of reporting, or maybe just caused by an outdated
> version of btrfsck (I am using
> btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1).
> 

You are running on an unmounted fs right?  Also please make sure you are running
the git version

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git

Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux