On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: > Right. Just thought it was better to check if the calloc() for fs_info > succeeded before derreferencing it for free'ing its super_copy member > (the function's code doesn't check if any of the malloc() / calloc() > calls returned non-NULL, so it wouldn't be inconsistent with the > existing code) Sorry, I've read it too quickly, the check has to be there of course. > >> free(fs_info); > >> return NULL; > > > > otherwise ok. Thanks. > > Thanks for review and advise. > Do you need more action from my side? No. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
