Re: btrfs (general) raid for other filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/05/13 18:39, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
>> So, an interesting variation could be to have filesystem level raid
>> operating on ext4 or nilfs or whatever... Would that be a sensible idea?
> 
> Thats already supported by using LVM. What do you think you would gain
> from layering in top of btrfs?

md-raid and lvm-raid are raid at the block level.

btrfs-raid offers a greater variety and far greater flexibility of raid
options individually for filedata and metadata at the filesystem level.

raid at the filesystem level should also gain higher performance over
that of just blindly replicating blocks of binary data across devices at
the block level.


My thoughts are to take advantage of the btrfs-raid work being done but
for all filesystems. Hence, we can then have a very flexible raid
available for whatever filesystem might be best for any underlying device.

OK... So we make all of lvm, md-raid, and drbd all redundant!

Regards,
Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux