On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:03:38 -0700 George Mitchell <george@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One the things that is frustrating me the most at this point from a user > perspective regarding btrfs is the current lack of virtual devices to > describe volumes and subvolumes. From a user perspective btrfs subvolumes have a lot in common with just regular directories aka folders, and nothing in common with (block)devices. "Describing them with virtual devices" does not seem to make a whole lot of sense. -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
