On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:54:17AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > Quoting Miao Xie (2013-05-16 03:22:37) > > > I must say that the patch itself looks harmless, the reason is not good enough. > > > > I don't agree with you. > > It is perishing that The memory reclaim task is blocked for a long time. We should avoid > > this problem. > > synchronize_rcu and friends can take a very very long time. I like this > patch as a way to avoid them, it's just keeps the whole kernel moving. > > -chris Okay, that teaches me another lesson, thanks Miao :) thanks, liubo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
