No, no, you misunderstood what i mean.:) You know, it will perhaps take a lot of time to do some benchmark. We only hope to get some suggestion about if it should be worth to continue working on. Very welcome to your and other guys' opinions. On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/09/2013 08:42, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> >> btrfs maintainer's opinion is very important, i guess. > > > My opinion is not important and I shall shut up? > > > >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Stefan Behrens >> <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 05/09/2013 01:13, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> HI, all >>>> >>>> I saw that bcache will be merged into kernel upstream soon, so i >>>> want to know if btrfs hot relocation support is still meanful, if no, >>>> i will not continue to work on it. can anyone let me know this? >>>> thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> Which one is better? >>> >>> Please do some measurements. Select typical file system use cases, and >>> publish and compare the measurement results of the two approaches. > > -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
