Re: [RFC 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/09/2013 08:42, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
btrfs maintainer's opinion is very important, i guess.

My opinion is not important and I shall shut up?


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Stefan Behrens
<sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/09/2013 01:13, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:

HI, all

     I saw that bcache will be merged into kernel upstream soon, so i
want to know if btrfs hot relocation support is still meanful, if no,
i will not continue to work on it. can anyone let me know this?
thanks.


Which one is better?

Please do some measurements. Select typical file system use cases, and
publish and compare the measurement results of the two approaches.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux