-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/05/13 16:13, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: > i want to know if btrfs hot relocation support is still meanful It is to me. The problem with bcache is that it is a cache. ie if you have a 256GB SSD and a 500GB HDD then you'll have total storage of 500GB. Hot relocation was described as having 750GB available in the same scenario. I'd also expect btrfs level support to be more friendly such as being able to mount -o degraded if one of the devices is missing. Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGLSIkACgkQmOOfHg372QSHQACeLwbhnVsH7+/6ZSIaGAcMUyBe gPwAoNAKBAFB65XZQbLyxyCJPHODR+9z =6OXt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
