[PATCH] Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in replace_path()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In replace_path(), if read_tree_block() fails, we cannot return
directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory
leak happens.

Similar to Wang's "Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in the
find_parent_nodes()" patch, the current commit fixes an issue that
is related to the "Btrfs: fix all callers of read_tree_block"
commit.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index aca3c30..e45d899 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ again:
 			if (!eb || !extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
 				ret = (!eb) ? -ENOMEM : -EIO;
 				free_extent_buffer(eb);
-				return ret;
+				break;
 			}
 			btrfs_tree_lock(eb);
 			if (cow) {
-- 
1.8.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux