On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:52:49PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:45:16PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Can you make an xfstest for this so we can make sure we don't screw this up in > > the future? Thanks, > > I wish I could, but I don't know how to test this in a xfstest case... > David has made a debug checker in kernel to cover this. If CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is on, a test similar to what I used back then would cover the boundary conditions. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg21021.html Looking at existing tests, 285 is a 'seek sanity test' that has several subtests inside. This looks like the right place to put it in. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
