On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:12:20 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:41:06PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: [...] >> + up(&fs_info->uuid_scan_sem); > > Does lockdep need to be instructed that a semaphore is released in a > different thread it's been taken? Not sure if this wasn't for mutexes. Not for semaphores. I'm also working on handling the case that the filesystem is mounted with an old kernel (what Josef and you have said in #btrfs). Thanks for your review comments to the 4 patches, David! All of them make sense and I will change it according to your comments. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
