Re: Btrfs performance problem; metadata size to blame?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Roger Binns <rogerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 28/04/13 12:57, Harald Glatt wrote:
>> If you want better answers ...
>
> There is a lot of good information at the wiki and it does see regular
> updates.  For example the performance mount options are on this page:
>
>   https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Mount_options
>
> Roger
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlF9g+wACgkQmOOfHg372QQu6QCffq/cB7GPutTwiAUE0CyTuIJx
> Qj8AnjsqxVyPrK5FTDqaLk1d1lsYYB38
> =6HN3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux