Re: Btrfs performance problem; metadata size to blame?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 28/04/13 12:57, Harald Glatt wrote:
> If you want better answers ...

There is a lot of good information at the wiki and it does see regular
updates.  For example the performance mount options are on this page:

  https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Mount_options

Roger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlF9g+wACgkQmOOfHg372QQu6QCffq/cB7GPutTwiAUE0CyTuIJx
Qj8AnjsqxVyPrK5FTDqaLk1d1lsYYB38
=6HN3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux