On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:04:13AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Sorry, I still didn't get how this happens... > > > > I'll try to create new btrfs with raid0, raid1, raid10, raid5, raid6... > > > > Could you please show me the testcase or something so that I can persuade > > myself? > > > > Ok I see what happened, I was using an old btrfs-image which makes one big chunk > to cover the entire file system, so that is how I was getting logical values > higher than the cache. So not a normal case for sure, but since it is possible > for it to happen in a bad file system situation we should still leave it. I agree, various versions of btrfs-progs are scattered among distros, kernel would be more robust when mounting a fs image created by an unknown btrfs-image versoin. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
