On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:16:41AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > This addresses the same issue as did: > > 2bd1169 btrfs-progs: root_item generation_v2 is out of sync after btrfsck > > but rather than optionally updating generation_v2 based > on the size of the existing item, increase the size of the > item as needed, and unconditionally set generation_v2. > This matches the kernel code, and keeping things in sync is a > Good Thing. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > V2: give it a better, more descriptive subject/summary > > kdave - since you already had Anand's patch on the integration > branch, I dunno if you want to add this on top, or just replace > it with a similar patch to this, up to you. I'm going to replace the patch (the integration branches are not linear and could be rebased, the purpose is to catch such issues earlier so the patch queue is moderately clean when it gets pulled). thanks, david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
