On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which > are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout. I support removing dead code, though nearly all of the functions make me wonder why they're not used. A few samples I see immediatelly: > btrfs_iref_to_path() The removed comment looks useful, I'd rather see it transferred to a function with similar goal (that probably got a different name during time). > __btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item() > __btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item() > __btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item() > find_eb_for_page() > btrfs_find_block_group() > range_straddles_pages() > extent_range_uptodate() > btrfs_file_extent_length() > btrfs_reada_detach() That's an API for readahead, thhugh maybe not used now as RA is not used and at all scenarios where it could. > btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid() Looks like there's a missing userspace counterpart, cancelling scrub by device is possible by design. > btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() Transcaction API, removing the func does not make sense without removing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT at the same time. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
