Re: Lockdep warning on for-linus branch (umount vs. evict_inode)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:34:03PM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> I was running fsstress to trigger a tree mod log problem on a current kernel
> with some custom debug patches applied, so if anyone looking at this needs any
> line numbers let me know:
> 
> <4>[ 1221.749586] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> <4>[ 1221.749589] 3.8.0+ #9 Not tainted
> <4>[ 1221.749590] -------------------------------------------------------
> <4>[ 1221.749591] fsstress/3108 is trying to acquire lock:
> <4>[ 1221.749592]  (sb_internal){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffffa0183cde>] start_transaction+0x2de/0x4f0 [btrfs]
> <4>[ 1221.749614] 
> <4>[ 1221.749614] but task is already holding lock:
> <4>[ 1221.749616]  (&fs_info->ordered_operations_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa019c089>] btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0x49/0x270 [btrfs]

I've seen and reported this warning a few days ago on IRC, Josef sent me
some patches to test, but it's not fixed yet.

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux