Hi David, maybe my old patch http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg19739.html can help this issue? Thanks, Alex. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:23 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:33:22AM +0200, Harald Glatt wrote: >> However what I actually did was: >> # cd /mnt/restore >> # nc -l -p 4444 | btrfs receive . >> >> After noticing this difference I had to try it again as described in >> my mail and - oh wonder - it works now!! Giving 'btrfs receive' a dot >> as a parameter seems to fail in this case. Is this expected behavior >> or a bug? > > Bug. Relative paths do not work on the receive side. > > david > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
