Hello, Jan
My bug fix patch-set V3 is coming,
I am afraid there will be conflicts.
Do i need rebase your patch set?
Thanks,
Wang
> When qgroup tracking is enabled, we do an automatic cycle of the new rescan
> mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index e0d9cf8..772d57e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -1534,10 +1534,14 @@ int btrfs_run_qgroups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> {
> struct btrfs_root *quota_root = fs_info->quota_root;
> int ret = 0;
> + int start_rescan_worker = 0;
>
> if (!quota_root)
> goto out;
>
> + if (!fs_info->quota_enabled && fs_info->pending_quota_state)
> + start_rescan_worker = 1;
> +
> fs_info->quota_enabled = fs_info->pending_quota_state;
>
> spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
> @@ -1563,6 +1567,12 @@ int btrfs_run_qgroups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> if (ret)
> fs_info->qgroup_flags |= BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT;
>
> + if (start_rescan_worker) {
> + ret = btrfs_qgroup_rescan(fs_info);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("btrfs: start rescan quota failed: %d\n", ret);
> + }
> +
> out:
>
> return ret;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
