On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:33:22AM +0200, Harald Glatt wrote: > However what I actually did was: > # cd /mnt/restore > # nc -l -p 4444 | btrfs receive . > > After noticing this difference I had to try it again as described in > my mail and - oh wonder - it works now!! Giving 'btrfs receive' a dot > as a parameter seems to fail in this case. Is this expected behavior > or a bug? Bug. Relative paths do not work on the receive side. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
