[PATCH V2 2/2] Btrfs: kill some BUG_ONs() in the find_parent_nodes()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The reason that BUG_ON() happens in these places is just
because of ENOMEM.

We try ro return ENOMEM rather than trigger BUG_ON(), the
caller will abort the transaction thus avoiding the kernel panic.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/backref.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index bd605c8..5ff46ee 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -900,7 +900,8 @@ again:
 		if (ref->count && ref->root_id && ref->parent == 0) {
 			/* no parent == root of tree */
 			ret = ulist_add(roots, ref->root_id, 0, GFP_NOFS);
-			BUG_ON(ret < 0);
+			if (ret)
+				goto out;
 		}
 		if (ref->count && ref->parent) {
 			struct extent_inode_elem *eie = NULL;
@@ -920,7 +921,9 @@ again:
 			ret = ulist_add_merge(refs, ref->parent,
 					      (uintptr_t)ref->inode_list,
 					      (u64 *)&eie, GFP_NOFS);
-			if (!ret && extent_item_pos) {
+			if (ret)
+				goto out;
+			if (extent_item_pos) {
 				/*
 				 * we've recorded that parent, so we must extend
 				 * its inode list here
@@ -930,7 +933,6 @@ again:
 					eie = eie->next;
 				eie->next = ref->inode_list;
 			}
-			BUG_ON(ret < 0);
 		}
 		kfree(ref);
 	}
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux