-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23/03/13 15:40, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I imagine it depends on the details of the workload & storage as well. If the people who write btrfs can't come up with some measures to deem appropriateness, then how can the administrators who have even less information :-) I suspect file size has nothing to do with it, and it is entirely about the volume of random writes. (But as a correlator smaller files are unlikely to get many random writes because they contain less useful information than larger files.) Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFOUr0ACgkQmOOfHg372QSIsgCg3D1k0dL/2bMQpzHRDdlMkUo2 TT8AoI11eLAdAv6iQPweHaeVUiJNSRf6 =OVVq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
