On 03/14/2013 12:36 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 3/13/13 10:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote: <maybe a little more commit log would be good?> So here is what confuses me now. :) *every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with 0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup under any circumstance. If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument? Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument later?
Thanks for the review. yes true. as of now it (BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB) only serves the purpose if in future should we need it. purpose is something like a user initiated thread which should to go to the backup-SB if primary-SB is not found ?. Or I can drop BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB idea depending on how it is convenient as a whole. Thanks, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
