On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:49:53PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: > > Using an asterisk '*' in something will be used as a command line argument risks having the shell expand it. Sticking to pure alphanumeric names would be better. > > Yeah, David's just pointed this out on IRC. After a bit of fiddling > around with various options, I like using X. I'd like to see something that can exist as na identifier or can be copy-pasted in one click, but '*' being a shell meta-character is IMO stronger argument against using it. > I'm also going to use lowercase c,s,p, because it seems to be > easier to read with the different-height characters. So we end up > with, e.g. > > 1c (single) > 2cXs (RAID-10) > 1cXs2p (RAID-6) This form looks ok to me. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
