Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency
overall.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 13ab4de..1f268888 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2312,6 +2312,7 @@ again:
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = start;
+ path->leave_spinning = 1;
if (merge) {
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
u64 extent_len;
@@ -2368,6 +2369,7 @@ again:
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf);
inode_add_bytes(inode, len);
+ btrfs_release_path(path);
ret = btrfs_inc_extent_ref(trans, root, new->bytenr,
new->disk_len, 0,
@@ -2381,6 +2383,7 @@ again:
ret = 1;
out_free_path:
btrfs_release_path(path);
+ path->leave_spinning = 0;
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
out_unlock:
unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, lock_end,
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
