Re: [bug] mkfs.btrfs reports device busy for ext4 mounted disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:03:25AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
> >  Next, since previously we had btrfs on sdb and mkfs.ext4
> >  does not overwrite super-block mirror 1.. so
> > 
> >    btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64
> > sb_bytenr)
> > 
> >  finds btrfs on sdb.
> 
> btrfs-progs shouldn't be unconditionally trusting the backup superblocks
> if the primary is garbage.  It should only check the backups if the user
> specifically asks it to.

Agreed. Let me add that all the rescue tools should accept a parameter
to pick the backup superblocks. Currently fsck -s, select-super -s,
restore -u (though I'd like see all the option names unified, 'S' is my
candidate that would not break compatibility).

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux