Re: Another defrag question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:47:28 +0100
Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> > Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
> > closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong
> > recommendation to keep up with the latest code. Hugo. 
> 
> The matter is that BTRFS had many early adopters just because it is -
> and has been for long now - in the mainline Linux kernel, so supposed
> stable and good choice for the future.

And it's marked as EXPERIMENTAL. So if you want to join the game, you
have to accept the rules.

> OTOH my 6th machine runs native ZFS on Linux, and I have to tell that
> it shows orders of magnitude better performance and never gave me a
> single problem in several (3 ?) years. Only upgrading the distro is
> always a big frightening and problematic. And initial installation
> was a bit tricky.

You didn't, many other had. I remember a lot of threads in the
OpenSolaris forum, where the solution for problems was: recreate your
filesystem, replay your backup.

> Everytime I show my Linux machines to friends and say : “Hey, I got
> the most advanced filesystem on earth !” I soon get the answer “Oh
> boy, that's the slowest machine boot and FS I've ever seen since I was
> reading floppy disks on my 386SX in 1991 ! Can you really live with
> this ?”

Did you presented it while (re)creating the inode_cache? Sounds a
little like that.

> So, for "not quite there" and the return codes "+20" that have been a
> minor pain in the arse for a couple years but the line is still in the
> code... I can understand developer's PoV, been there, done that, but
> still, BTRFS might in the end lose a numer of its early adopters if it
> keeps being "not quite there" too long.
> 
> Shitfing to ZFS is just a PPA and 2 apt-get install commands away...
> It will definitely be easier than start playing with mainline PPA
> Ubuntu kernels...

So why do you bother with btrfs, if ZFS fit your needs?


regards,
  Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux