On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote: > Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit : >> Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly >> closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation >> to keep up with the latest code. Hugo. > > The matter is that BTRFS had many early adopters just because it is - > and has been for long now - in the mainline Linux kernel, so supposed > stable and good choice for the future. > > To be honest (and not wanting to troll, promised) this is the only > single reason for which I use BTRFS on 5 of my 6 machines at home - just > because I thought that "Just upgrade the distro every 6 months and it > will become better and better over time, no hassle, make my life easy". > Unfortunately many distros don't make it obvious, but Btrfs is still hidden behind a giant EXPERIMENTAL label in the kernel configuration. Regards, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
