From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The original code forget to check whether quota has been disabled firstly,
and it will return 'EINVAL' and return error to users if quota has been
disabled,it will be unfriendly and confusing for users to see that.
So just return directly if quota has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index a5c8562..2efd724 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -847,6 +847,10 @@ int btrfs_quota_disable(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
int ret = 0;
spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
+ if (!fs_info->quota_root) {
+ spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
fs_info->quota_enabled = 0;
fs_info->pending_quota_state = 0;
quota_root = fs_info->quota_root;
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
