Re: Fwd: Current State of BTRFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I ran it as root. The first times there was no output whatsoever. This
time triggering gave the SysRq : Show Blocked State line. Strange

2013/2/9 cwillu <cwillu@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Florian Hofmann
> <fhofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Oh ... I should have mentioned that btrfs is running on top of LUKS.
>>
>> 2013/2/8 Florian Hofmann <fhofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> $ btrfs fi df /
>>> Data: total=165.00GB, used=164.19GB
>>> System, DUP: total=32.00MB, used=28.00KB
>>> System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
>>> Metadata, DUP: total=2.00GB, used=1.40GB
>>>
>>> $ btrfs fi show
>>> failed to read /dev/sr0
>>> Label: none  uuid: b4ec0b14-2a42-47e3-a0cd-1257e789ed25
>>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 165.59GB
>>> devid    1 size 600.35GB used 169.07GB path /dev/dm-0
>>>
>>> Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I just noticed that I can force 'it' by transferring a large file from
>>> my NAS. I did the sysrq-trigger thing, but there is no suspicious
>>> output in dmesg (http://pastebin.com/swrCdC3U).
>>>
>>> Anything else?
>
> The pastebin didn't include any output from sysrq-w; even if there's
> nothing to report there would still be a dozen lines or so per cpu; at
> the absolute minimum there should be a line for each time you ran it:
>
> [4477369.680307] SysRq : Show Blocked State
>
> Note that you need to echo as root, or use the keyboard combo
> alt-sysrq-w to trigger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux