Re: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix memory leak of pending_snapshot->inherit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:43:47 +0100, Arne Jansen wrote:
> On 02/07/13 07:02, Miao Xie wrote:
>> The argument "inherit" of btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid() was assigned
>> to NULL during we created the snapshots, so we didn't free it though we
>> called kfree() in the caller.
>>
>> But since we are sure the snapshot creation is done after the function -
>> btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid() - completes, it is safe that we don't
>> assign the pointer "inherit" to NULL, and just free it in the caller of
>> btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid(). In this way, the code can become more
>> readable.
> 
> NAK. The snapshot creation is triggered from btrfs_commit_transaction,
> I don't want to implicitly rely on commit_transaction being called for
> each snapshot created. I'm not even sure the async path really commits
> the transaction.
> The responsibility for the creation is passed to the pending_snapshot
> data structure, and so should the responsibility for the inherit struct.

I don't agree with you.

We are sure the async path really commits the transaction because we pass 1
as the value of the third argument into btrfs_commit_transaction_async(). It
means we must wait for the completion of the current transaction. So Freeing
the inherit struct in the caller is safe.
 
Besides that, the pending_snapshot data structure is also allocated and freed
by the same function in fact, why not use this style for the inherit struct.
I think it is more readable. Assigning a pointer to be NULL and freeing it
in the caller is very strange for the people who reads the code. (It is also
the reason why I made the mistake at the beginning.)

So I think my patch is reasonable.

Thanks
Miao

> -Arne
> 
>>
>> Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 18 +++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index 02d3035..40f2fbf 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static noinline int create_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root,
>>  				  struct dentry *dentry,
>>  				  char *name, int namelen,
>>  				  u64 *async_transid,
>> -				  struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit **inherit)
>> +				  struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit *inherit)
>>  {
>>  	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>>  	struct btrfs_key key;
>> @@ -401,8 +401,7 @@ static noinline int create_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root,
>>  	if (IS_ERR(trans))
>>  		return PTR_ERR(trans);
>>  
>> -	ret = btrfs_qgroup_inherit(trans, root->fs_info, 0, objectid,
>> -				   inherit ? *inherit : NULL);
>> +	ret = btrfs_qgroup_inherit(trans, root->fs_info, 0, objectid, inherit);
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		goto fail;
>>  
>> @@ -530,7 +529,7 @@ fail:
>>  
>>  static int create_snapshot(struct btrfs_root *root, struct dentry *dentry,
>>  			   char *name, int namelen, u64 *async_transid,
>> -			   bool readonly, struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit **inherit)
>> +			   bool readonly, struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit *inherit)
>>  {
>>  	struct inode *inode;
>>  	struct btrfs_pending_snapshot *pending_snapshot;
>> @@ -549,10 +548,7 @@ static int create_snapshot(struct btrfs_root *root, struct dentry *dentry,
>>  	pending_snapshot->dentry = dentry;
>>  	pending_snapshot->root = root;
>>  	pending_snapshot->readonly = readonly;
>> -	if (inherit) {
>> -		pending_snapshot->inherit = *inherit;
>> -		*inherit = NULL;	/* take responsibility to free it */
>> -	}
>> +	pending_snapshot->inherit = inherit;
>>  
>>  	trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root->fs_info->extent_root, 6);
>>  	if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
>> @@ -692,7 +688,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_mksubvol(struct path *parent,
>>  				   char *name, int namelen,
>>  				   struct btrfs_root *snap_src,
>>  				   u64 *async_transid, bool readonly,
>> -				   struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit **inherit)
>> +				   struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit *inherit)
>>  {
>>  	struct inode *dir  = parent->dentry->d_inode;
>>  	struct dentry *dentry;
>> @@ -1454,7 +1450,7 @@ out:
>>  static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid(struct file *file,
>>  				char *name, unsigned long fd, int subvol,
>>  				u64 *transid, bool readonly,
>> -				struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit **inherit)
>> +				struct btrfs_qgroup_inherit *inherit)
>>  {
>>  	int namelen;
>>  	int ret = 0;
>> @@ -1563,7 +1559,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2(struct file *file,
>>  
>>  	ret = btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid(file, vol_args->name,
>>  					      vol_args->fd, subvol, ptr,
>> -					      readonly, &inherit);
>> +					      readonly, inherit);
>>  
>>  	if (ret == 0 && ptr &&
>>  	    copy_to_user(arg +
>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux