On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:25:26PM -0500, Norbert Veber wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:34:04PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > Otherwise, Mark's patches add the incompat bit unconditionally, we need > > a way how to make it tunable in the same way as other mkfs do. I'd say > > to take them as-is now and extend mkfs later. > > Well I guess its more of a job for btrfstune. Same way as tune2fs can > enable all of their features. Right. > Having to reformat seems uncecessary. Right. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
