On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:31:53AM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote: > This means that dists are striping binaries... > In which case it would be no problem to have then build the static target, > perhaps we could try to verify if they are available and build btrfs.static > and btrfsck.static if possible.... I like that, keeping the .static versions along the dynamic ones, just for the rescue purposes. (And to reduce the total file size even further merge the fsck functionlity into 'btrfs', but this is not a primary goal now.) david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
