Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: put csums on the right ordered extent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:45:35PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I noticed a WARN_ON going off when adding csums because we were going over
> the amount of csum bytes that should have been allowed for an ordered
> extent.  This is a leftover from when we used to hold the csums privately
> for direct io, but now we use the normal ordered sum stuff so we need to
> make sure and check if we've moved on to another extent so that the csums
> are added to the right extent.  Without this we could end up with csums for
> bytenrs that don't have extents to cover them yet.  Thanks,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Survived a few hours of Chris' test and I'm running the full xfstests
again now.

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux