On wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:06:21 +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:44:49PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote: >> No, we can't. The other tasks which flush the delalloc data may remove the inode >> from the delalloc list/splice list. If we release the lock, we will meet the race >> between list traversing and list_del(). > > OK, then please merge patch 1 and 4 so that we can backport 1 less patch > at least. I don't think we should merge these two patch because they do two different things - one is bug fix, and the other is just a improvement, and this improvement changes the logic of the code and might be argumentative for some developers. So 2 patches is better than one, I think. Thanks Miao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
