Re: fsck.btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Zach Brown <zab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> 1. Would btrfsck be the appropriate program to run at bootup?  If it
>>> is, with what parameters?
>> 
>>   No, it's not necessary to run an fs checker on every boot. You can
>> either turn off the checks in fstab, or symlink /sbin/fsck.btrfs to
>> /bin/true.
> 
> For what it's worth, I gather that the XFS guys used to do the latter
> and that it broke something.  Somewhere.  I have no idea what.
> 

Yeah, lost in the mists of time by now.

Seems like maybe by now system installers should set up fstab correctly for a journaling ds, but since ext[34] wants boot-time fsck despite journaling, maybe it's best to provide a fsck.$FS even if it's a no-op.

> Hence fsck.xfs(8) which has perhaps the greatest description in its man
> page. 
> 
\o/ 

-Eric

> - z
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux