We're deleting the stupid thing, no sense in updating the inode for the new
size. We're running into having 50-100 orphans left over with xfstests 83
because of ENOSPC when trying to start the transaction for the inode update.
This patch fixes this problem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 +-----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index f33269a..ac7f471 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3898,7 +3898,7 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
goto no_delete;
}
- trans = btrfs_start_transaction_lflush(root, 1);
+ trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, rsv);
@@ -3911,10 +3911,6 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
if (ret != -ENOSPC)
break;
- trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
- ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode);
- BUG_ON(ret);
-
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
trans = NULL;
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(root);
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
