Re: btrfs subvolume snapshot performance problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Sylvain Alain <d2racing911@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, if I don't use the discard command, how often do I need to run the
> fstrim command ?

If your ssd isn't a pile of crap, never.  SSD's are always
over-provisioned, and so every time an erase block fills up, the drive
knows that there must be one erase-block worth of garbage which could
be compacted, erased, and added to the pool of empty blocks.  The
crappiest ones only do this as needed (which is why their write speed
plummets with use), and really benefit from people forcing the issue
with -o discard or occasional fstrim.  Everything else should get
along fine without it, although an occasional fstrim certainly won't
hurt: it just shouldn't help much.

> I found this thread : https://patrick-nagel.net/blog/archives/337

It's worth noting that there's a large number of very effective tricks
that an ssd can perform to almost completely negate the caveat
mentioned there.  It really is a solved problem in a modern ssd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux