Re: Question about btrfs snapshot delay and rm -rf delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander:
> Sylvain Alain wrote (ao):
> > Hi, right now I own this SSD :
> > 
> > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
> 
> > Also, this is my /etc/fstab
> > /dev/sda3      /boot            ext2       noauto,noatime,defaults
> > /dev/sda1      /boot/efi        vfat        noauto,defaults
> > /dev/sda4      /                  btrfs
> 
> SSDs are sensitive to partitioning. Easiest is not to partition at all.

Huh? How so?

My Intel SSD 320 is partitioned and uses LVM in the biggest partition
and is still just fine after 19 month. Media wearout indicator still at 100
(of 100).

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux