Re: Example of BTRFS uglyssima performance : Bitcoin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/12/12 23:24, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:

> I understand the suggestion from a developper's PoV, but from a
> user's that's much too much hassle living ahead of one's distro's
> kernel, or using "vanilla" ones. Been there, done that. No more
> suffering for me please ;-))
> 
> I'll have to stick with current Ubuntu kernel, or at least with a
> future backport...

In that case maybe using an experimental filesystem that is under rapid
development might not be a good choice, it might be better to stick to
one of the existing stable filesystems instead.

Have you benchmarked your workload on other filesystems?

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux