On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:09:16PM +0100, David Arendt wrote:
> Well, this is only code to demonstrate the problem, the ; is normally a
> silly mistake, but for my test case valuelen is < 0 so, the ; doesn't
> change anything. With this corrected, the problem stays the same.
>
> On 11/23/12 21:43, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > On Friday, November 23, 2012 18:45:04 David Arendt wrote:
> >> for (i = 0; i < attrslen; i+= strlen(&attrs[i]) + 1)
> >> {
> >> printf("processing attribute %s\n", &attrs[i]);
> >>
> >> valuelen = lgetxattr(argv[1], &attrs[i], value, 1024);
> >>
> >> if (valuelen < 0);
> > Hmmm ----------------^
Hi David,
Any dmesg output for this?
thanks,
liubo
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
