Hi,
I am using kernel 3.7-rc6.
I have written a test application for extended attributes and have for
some folders a wired behaviour:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <attr/xattr.h>
char attrs[1024];
ssize_t attrslen;
int i;
char value[1024];
ssize_t valuelen;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc != 2)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Syntax: testxattr <filename>\n");
return 1;
}
printf("processing file %s\n", argv[1]);
attrslen = llistxattr(argv[1], attrs, 1024);
if (attrslen < 0)
{
perror("listxattr failed");
return 1;
}
for (i = 0; i < attrslen; i+= strlen(&attrs[i]) + 1)
{
printf("processing attribute %s\n", &attrs[i]);
valuelen = lgetxattr(argv[1], &attrs[i], value, 1024);
if (valuelen < 0);
{
perror("lgetxattr failed");
return 1;
}
printf("value %.*s", (int) valuelen, value);
}
return 0;
}
is returning:
processing file /u00/root.20121121.210102.full/var/lib/nfs/sm
processing attribute system.posix_acl_default
lgetxattr failed: No data available
output of stat:
File: '/u00/root.20121121.210102.full/var/lib/nfs/sm'
Size: 94 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 3ah/58d Inode: 1331353 Links: 1
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: (65534/ nobody) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2012-10-18 21:25:11.350000993 +0200
Modify: 2012-11-21 06:32:24.050210417 +0100
Change: 2012-11-21 06:32:24.050210417 +0100
Birth: -
Is this a bug in btrfs or do I miss something here ?
Thanks in advance,
David Arendt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html