On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:34:54PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> We forget to protect the modified_extents list, fix it.
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
thanks,
liubo
> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> index cbb544e..f7e9387 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> @@ -3525,8 +3525,10 @@ next_slot:
> struct extent_map_tree *tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->extent_tree;
> struct extent_map *em, *n;
>
> + write_lock(&tree->lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(em, n, &tree->modified_extents, list)
> list_del_init(&em->list);
> + write_unlock(&tree->lock);
> }
>
> if (inode_only == LOG_INODE_ALL && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> --
> 1.7.6.5
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
