Re: Why btrfs inline small file by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 Oct 2012 04:57 -0600, from cwillu@xxxxxxxxxx (cwillu):
> 9.08GB + 992.48MB*2 == 11.02GB
> 
> 10.85GB + 518MB*2 == 11.86GB
> 
> That's nearly a GB smaller.

That, too; I missed the "DUP". Not quite as pronounced as in my
calculations, then, but still a significant enough difference.

-- 
Michael Kjörling • http://michael.kjorling.se • michael@xxxxxxxxxxx
                “People who think they know everything really annoy
                those of us who know we don’t.” (Bjarne Stroustrup)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux