Re: Why btrfs inline small file by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>> with defaults (inlining small files):
>>>> real    4m39.253s
>>>> Data: total=10.01GB, used=9.08GB
>>>> Metadata, DUP: total=2.00GB, used=992.48MB
>
> This uses 10290.40 MB total, if we pad with zeroes (9.08GB plus
> 992.48MB).

>>>> without inline:
>>>> real    4m42.085s
>>>> Data: total=11.01GB, used=10.85GB
>>>> Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GB, used=518.59MB
>
> Under the same assumption, this uses 11628.99 MB total (10.85GB +
> 518.59MB).

> With inlining, you're using about 1.3 GB less disk space and require a
thank you for clarifying this. 10% is indeed a benefit.

> few seconds less wall-clock time for the same thing.
those where only 2 tests, have to make a lot more runs
to make qualified judgement there.
one percent difference is noise floor to me.

Ahmet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux